Author Archives: taqiyyatalk
Recently, in the news, there was much discussion about the knuckle-headed Florida “pastor,” Terry Jones, who thought that burning the Koran would be a wonderful display of his Christian maturity. The vacuousness in Jones’ thinking defies explanation and I think it is the wrong thing to do, not because of any lofty respect I have for the Koran — but for the opposite reason. Instead of burning it, I think we should encourage people to read it.
Christianity is a thinking religion. Despite the accusations brought against it by our “new atheist” friends, Christianity welcomes questions and seeks to provide answers to those who ask about the reason for the hope that we have. We are called to defend the faith intellectually, respectfully and to love our God “with all our mind.” It is therefore un-Christian and anti-evangelistic to insult, rather than persuade, and inflame anger rather than promote a loving dialogue with anyone. On a purely practical note, any action that puts our troops in more danger because it unnecessarily arouses the anger of militant Islamists is also morally indefensible.
Ignoring or dismissing the claims of other religions does nothing to lead those who believe them back to the real Truth. When you read the Koran, you find a striking contrast between it and the Bible. The Koran reads more like a stream on consciousness than a historical account of actual events that took place. It is confusing and disjointed. In addition to that, reading the Koran and its associated texts reveals some interesting facts like the theory of abrogation.
This Islamic doctrine claims states that those parts of the Koran written after 622 AD (when Muhammad returned to Medina) overrule earlier verses. When you read these passages you find that it is the later passages contain the commands to:
- “fight and slay the unbelievers wherever you find them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war” (Surah 9, verse 5) or …
- “Fight those who do not believe in Allah nor the Last Day, nor So, nor hold that forbidden which has been forbidden by Allah and His Apostle, nor acknowledge the religion of truth (Islam), even if they are of the 40 people of the Book, until they pay the jizya (Islamic tax) with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.”
So, where we are constantly told that Islam is “a religion of peace,” actually reading it reveals quite the opposite. You will also find Muslims who deny the reality of the theory of abrogation. There is a reason for that — a reason that becomes obvious when you consider a second doctrine that was the impetus for this blog. The theory of abrogation is an obvious concern to non-Muslims, but it is as least something that we can see being used against us. This second doctrine is the insidious one. It is the doctrine of taqiyya (Surah 3, verse 28), which holds that Muslims should not be friends with infidels except as a deception, always with the end goal of converting, subduing, or destroying them.
Taqiyya is what encourages Muslims to use our own system of freedom, liberty and justice against us with the goal of destroying western civilization in general, and American society in particular, from within. When we understand that, and then look around with skeptical eyes at the actions of Muslim leaders, this deception begins to stand out in ways that are hard to miss.
Taqiyya means we should watch what Muslim leaders do, compare it to what they say, and realize that the two exist in radically different universes.
Many of us seem to be oblivious to the fact that we are engaged in a war wherein our nation’s greatest treasure — our young men and women — are being maimed and killed every day as we drive through Starbucks and update our iPods. As if that isn’t bad enough, we are also engaged in a war that is going right under our noses — right here where we live. Those two wars are inextricably connected and most of us have no idea how they are.
We rightly argue about economics and politics, but more and more we seem to do so in blissful ignorance about a threat to our common life and liberty that is much greater than anything being discussed in our internal political debates. The threat may one day include nuclear, biological, chemical or some other kind of active and obviously violent force. But for now this threat is insidious, and therefore a much more dangerous. It is the threat of an idea that has consequences far graver than most of us can imagine.
And that is just the way our enemy likes it.
Most of us have heard of jihad, the concept of an ongoing “struggle” that motivates Islamic fundamentalists to fly airplanes into buildings and blow themselves up in the streets of the middle east. No doubt, jihad is a threat to us here in the United States also. But, since September 11, 2001 you may have noticed that bold, blatant physical attacks like we experienced that day are few and far between. That is because a different, more effective tactic is at work. It is the concept of taqiyya, and it will be the downfall of this nation if we don’t wake up to it.
That wake up call is the purpose of this blog. And though I am a nobody with no clout or market to impact, I hope this small attempt to uncover taqiyya will somehow mushroom into a wake up call to many others. The tactic is invisible but if we remain ignorant of it, the stakes are enormous.
If you want to a quick primer on this issue, the first thing you need to do is listen to this radio interview with Strategic Engagement Group‘s John Guandolo, a former Marine and SWAT Team member who now does strategic security consulting for all levels of government law enforcement about the threat of the Global Islamic Movement.
Guandolo is the kind of guy who gives credence to this issue as someone like me never could. My point is to say that this blog is not just the rantings of some loony, fringe conspiracy theorist. It is not just my opinion or the result of my imagination. The information I hope to present here will always be supported by reasonable, credible sources. I will not speculate or extrapolate beyond what the evidence allows.